What Do We Do Next Time?

Posted by Jeff Rubin on November 11th, 2009 under SmallerWorldTags: , ,  • 8 Comments

Correctly diagnosing the nature of a disease is usually an essential first step to finding its cure. Similarly, knowing what caused this recession seems pretty pivotal to figuring out how to avoid falling into the next one.

Subprime mortgages may have blown up Wall Street, but it was triple-digit oil prices that blew up the world economy. This distinction is not just academic—it has huge implications for what steps governments should have taken and, maybe even more importantly, what steps they shouldn’t have taken.

While governments can bail out insolvent investment banks, foreclosed subprime mortgage holders and bankrupt auto producers, there can be no energy bailout. Neither the Federal Reserve Board nor the Treasury Department can create a single BTU of energy, nor can any other central bank or finance department around the world, no matter how much money they print or how big a budgetary deficit they rack up.

Having already blown the taxpayers’ wad bailing out everybody under the sun, what’s left in the government cookie jar to fight the next oil-induced recession?

The US budget deficit is already nearing one-and-a-half trillion dollars. Proportional to the size of the economy, it’s the highest it’s been since World War II.

So what happens the next time our economies encounter triple-digit oil prices?

With oil already trading at nearly $80 per barrel, I guess we’ll find out soon enough.

Not only do massive deficits leave no more budgetary room for further fiscal stimulus but, even worse, we will have to start paying back today’s bailouts just as tomorrow’s oil crisis slams the brakes on the economy again.

That means the next time motorists see four-dollar-per-gallon pump prices, they are likely to be hit at the same time with huge deficit-cutting tax increases and equally huge cuts in government spending.

Getting the last recession wrong not only means we are ill-equipped to deal with the next one, but also that it will be all the more severe when we have to start paying the bill for the policy moves we now have to reverse.

Fiscal pump priming and printing money aren’t the answer to triple-digit oil prices. Moving from a global economy to a local one is.

I’m Jeff Rubin, and I believe your world is about to get a whole lot smaller.

Share
  • jimmy

    With a large amount of the stimulus money going to improve energy efficiency and supposedly to make GM and Chrysler to build more fuel efficient vehicles what would have you recommended that the government should have done during this last recession to make sure we are ready for the next recession (minus bailing out the banks as I am sure every one thinks that is a bad idea).

  • jimmy

    With a large amount of the stimulus money going to improve energy efficiency and supposedly to make GM and Chrysler to build more fuel efficient vehicles what would have you recommended that the government should have done during this last recession to make sure we are ready for the next recession (minus bailing out the banks as I am sure every one thinks that is a bad idea).

  • Rob Dixon

    Hi Jeff, I bought two copies of your book, and one for friends. I was very luckly to see the great calls you made on oil and cdn$, and act on them. That's why my money stay's in Canada, so much great stuff to own.
    Yes your Website is in my favorites
    Take care Rob

  • Name

    Wouldn't this result in a wartime-like rational health improvement as we make do?

  • claudeshogun

    The Chartist structure in place on oil visible on the chart as well as on the weekdays is a structure type cup with handle (Cup with Handle) Chartist training which is very bullish.

    Overcoming the resistance of $ 75 dollar, the next target prospective for oil is $ 115 dollars, but first en route to the area highly symbolic and technical $ 100. This rose upward from the black gold could be done in 3 stages, the first would affect the area of the 87 $ -89 $, then the area of $ 100 with its symbolic and psychological technique (provide good resistance to near the area of $ 100) and then the $ 115.

    But somehow the priority is the area of $ 100, the calculation with the prospective target of $ 115 million has been obtained by taking the top of the cup at $ 75 and subtracting the low $ 35, we get a differential of $ 40 dollar we add $ 75, making an objective prospective minimum $ 115. ($ 75 – $ 40 = $ 75 $ 35 = $ 115 target was achieved)

    Currently what is interesting about the Chartist structure in place on oil is that the message is written on 2 windows of time (Time Frame) is the same on the chart by days on the chart week, ie to one type of structure bullish cup with handle, then it reinforces the potentially bullish sign up on oil. But of course that this upward climb will not be straight up …

  • Serge Lapointe

    I bought your book about a month ago and reading it was a real pleasure, it reads like a novel and I had to read it a second time to really have a better understanding of numbers and the overall situation. After reading I felt that everything you wrote was pretty accurate except for the natural gas situation. When you wrote the book, there wasn't the question of all this new gas coming from the shale plays on the market. Since I read that there is now enought ng in the US alone for more than 100 years. Do you feel this will change the consumers or government strategy towards usage of oil vs natural gas? And if I may, another question relating to the IEA, I was looking at their projection of oil projection for the next 30 years and they count LNG as part of the oil production, how is that? Can LNG be turned into some kind of oil?
    Thanks

  • rob dixon

    Hello Serge Lapointe.
    RLI (reserve life index) is the rate you use Nat gas today, Yes it could last a 100yrs, but what if we start to use less oil for cars, and use natgas for a transportion fuel as a replacement fuel, the RLI will get smaller very fast as it starts to replace oil.

  • rob dixon

    Hello Serge Lapointe.
    RLI (reserve life index) is the rate you use Nat gas today, Yes it could last a 100yrs, but what if we start to use less oil for cars, and use natgas for a transportion fuel as a replacement fuel, the RLI will get smaller very fast as it starts to replace oil.