Comments on: Why the United States Needs All the Tar Sands Oil They Can Get

By: Iryan

Iryan — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:01:00 +0000

Thats not the only oil that Canada has.And she is rich in natural gas. However it is the biggest source . They are working feverishly to clean up the operation so hopefully it won”t be long before the oil will be much cleaner. If the US doesn”t like it they will soon have a lot of ships docked and mothballed with no fuel. And how about the Air force.. Their arrogance may cause a problem if Canada sells to China. Gee and the Muricans may discover theres more to Canada than they thought.

By: Does Canada Really Want to be an Energy Superpower? | Jeff Rubin

Does Canada Really Want to be an Energy Superpower? | Jeff Rubin — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:02:30 +0000

[...] of the country’s manufacturing sector. As triple-digit oil prices pull more and more oil out from tar sand production, the higher the Canadian dollar will soar, and the fewer autos and less machinery and steel the [...]

By: D Watt

D Watt — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:05:17 +0000

How true is this: "the USA has 3 to 4.3 Billion Barrels of Technically Recoverable Oil Assessed in North Dakota and Montana’s Bakken Formation"? This is according to the USGS release at : http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1911 Why is the public not hearing more about this vast reserve?

By: D Watt

D Watt — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:05:17 +0000

By: Why Can’t We Build Coal Plants Too? | Jeff Rubin

Why Can’t We Build Coal Plants Too? | Jeff Rubin — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:10:32 +0000

[...] Try setting up a brand-spanking-new coal-fired power plant, like the 800 China and India will have on the go, and see how far you get in the approval process. With the exception of major coal-producing areas like Wyoming, West Virginia and Alberta, you can’t get new coal-fired facilities licensed anymore, not even in places like Texas, which still get nearly half their power from coal, let alone in holier-than-thou states like California. [...]