A $10-per-barrel drop in oil prices seems a curious response to the ongoing disaster at BP’s Deepwater Horizon wellhead, and to its potentially devastating repercussions on future world oil supply. But when the Dow loses 1,000 points in the same week, there’s obviously something else going on.

If the world’s economic outlook is the same as Greece’s, both stock and oil markets have every right to be concerned about valuations. Brutal fiscal austerity and the general strikes and growing social unrest it triggers are not normally the ingredients for a sunny outlook for world oil demand, nor, for that matter, world anything demand. Given where Greece’s economy is likely to be heading, its citizens will consume less oil, not more, in the future.

Of course, it isn’t really Greece that Wall Street cares about. Financial markets are certainly justified in seeing a lot of Greece’s problems in other countries. And they’re not all in Euroland. As I’ve said before in this blog, we’re all PIGS (Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain) now—at least all the oil-guzzling economies of the old economic order are. Today, the countries whose fiscal futures traders are shorting aren’t developing countries with fragile financial markets but rather developed nations with their supposedly world-leading financial institutions.

For example, the US federal deficit is now a double-digit ratio of the country’s GDP, a statistic that might have an IMF SWAT team arrive if we were talking about the same fiscal situation prevailing in a developing country with a lot of international IOUs outstanding. And the US has a lot more debt out there than all of the PIGS put together. Will American taxpayers soon be asked to make many of the sacrifices Greek taxpayers are being asked to make today? And what will that do for their future fuel consumption? Probably the same thing it will do for the Greeks’.

What markets have yet to recognize is that although the fiscal crises in those economies can only hasten the downward spiral, oil demand had already peaked before they occurred and begun its terminal decline. But in a world where oil supply will no longer be growing (and may even decline, if deep-water fields become off bounds), oil consumption suddenly becomes a zero-sum game. There must be fewer cars on the road in Greece and in the United States if there are to be more cars on the road in China and India.

The fiscal crisis in Europe and the US doesn’t mean the world will want less oil. It just means that global demand will become even more driven by the Chinas and Indias of the world. If you thought global economic growth and commodity demand were skewed to the developing world before all the developed economies ran up massive fiscal deficits, just wait until you see what the gap will look like when those economies have to start paying those deficits down.

Share
  • Laurent Horvath

    Jeff, can you contact me by e-mail. Thanks, Laurent

  • Newfie

    Well we won't have to wait long for the bottom to fall out. Two years according to a study by the US military:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/apr/11/…

  • grandpagrinch

    Jeff I caught your interview on BNN today – very insightful, funny & to the point!

  • Joe Wheeler

    I read this article after posting a comment on the previous one, but still stand by my comments and don't think this article explains the issues of $10-drop-per barrel or lower coming gas prices at the pumps during summer driving season.

    Part of the problem is reflected in Jeff's assertion in his manifesto/biography that “It wasn’t subprime mortgages but triple-digit oil prices that brought down the world economy.” Actually it is a bit of both, and the distortions come from the same source: the financialization of capital, whether it pertains to a commodity or real estate pricing. Jeff can't just write off the trillions of phony money created via subprime mortgages, clearly they have as much to do with the economic downturn as oil prices, because both phenomena are driven by the same forces of manipulative speculation over production in the real economy. Actually, these “crises” were all foretold originally by Marx and refined by other political economists such as the Uno school. In Jeff's defence, I will say that oil is indeed a fundamental issue; at the time Marx did his analysis, the vast exploitation of oil hadn't even really begun. Thus nay-sayers have been able to deny Marx's analysis of the contradictions of capitalism, saying that it couldn't happen, didn't happen, therefore he was wrong. He was not wrong, he just didn't have a crystal ball to tell him that the ill-fated capitalist enterprise would get a 100 year+ boost from massively exploiting the finite petroleum resources of the Earth. Now that this temporary boon is coming to an end, so the contradictions of the capitalist system will arrive at their logical outcome (economic collapse). What Jeff keeps alluding to in the need for fundamental adjustments is in reality the need for a viable non-centralized socialism. In that regard, Canada is already well-positioned to make that transition, as, our constitution, unlike that of the USA after the civil war, is still a “confederation”, meaning socioeconomic means can still be applied differently as relevant to different parts of the country with a loose common association. Put another way, Canada is in a good position to restructure itself along reasonable socialist lines that allow for ecologically conserving and functional local and regional economies within a national umbrella. In form if not philosophy the Transition Towns movement already intuitively understands this. The major blocks in this is our strangling ties with the USA and the “attitude inoculation” against the idea of “socialism”, which is just another name for more equitable distribution of wealth that allows a society to sustain itself. The only prerequisite is the abolition of capital “markets” (financialized rather than 'real') in favour of real, local genuine markets that manifest a true productive economy where everyone wins instead of a few predatory speculators.

    Just one crucial example: in the realm of shifting from a petro-based economy to one that is energy-sustainable, that can't happen under our last-stage capitalism, but can be done under a sensibly-rendered socialism. If we do not make that step, since we have so much oil, fresh water, etc., we will be subject to being preyed upon by less prudent nations, and they don't have to attack us to achieve this, the capitalist system will bring about the depredation all on its own and we'll be left wondering 'what happened?'. Socialism is the real answer to Jeff's call for an urgent re-adjustment. He himself became sufficiently uneasy with commenting on the machinations of Capital that he left his job, but he hasn't really grasped what is necessary to effect a true transition. Jeff, discard your attitude inoculation and consider what a mature socialism could do to achieve the aims you aspire to see.

  • Joe Wheeler

    I read this article after posting a comment on the previous one, but still stand by my comments and don't think this article explains the issues of $10-drop-per barrel or lower coming gas prices at the pumps during summer driving season.

    Part of the problem is reflected in Jeff's assertion in his manifesto/biography that “It wasn’t subprime mortgages but triple-digit oil prices that brought down the world economy.” Actually it is a bit of both, and the distortions come from the same source: the financialization of capital, whether it pertains to a commodity or real estate pricing. Jeff can't just write off the trillions of phony money created via subprime mortgages, clearly they have as much to do with the economic downturn as oil prices, because both phenomena are driven by the same forces of manipulative speculation over production in the real economy. Actually, these “crises” were all foretold originally by Marx and refined by other political economists such as the Uno school. In Jeff's defence, I will say that oil is indeed a fundamental issue; at the time Marx did his analysis, the vast exploitation of oil hadn't even really begun. Thus nay-sayers have been able to deny Marx's analysis of the contradictions of capitalism, saying that it couldn't happen, didn't happen, therefore he was wrong. He was not wrong, he just didn't have a crystal ball to tell him that the ill-fated capitalist enterprise would get a 100 year+ boost from massively exploiting the finite petroleum resources of the Earth. Now that this temporary boon is coming to an end, so the contradictions of the capitalist system will arrive at their logical outcome (economic collapse). What Jeff keeps alluding to in the need for fundamental adjustments is in reality the need for a viable non-centralized socialism. In that regard, Canada is already well-positioned to make that transition, as, our constitution, unlike that of the USA after the civil war, is still a “confederation”, meaning socioeconomic means can still be applied differently as relevant to different parts of the country with a loose common association. Put another way, Canada is in a good position to restructure itself along reasonable socialist lines that allow for ecologically conserving and functional local and regional economies within a national umbrella. In form if not philosophy the Transition Towns movement already intuitively understands this. The major blocks in this is our strangling ties with the USA and the “attitude inoculation” against the idea of “socialism”, which is just another name for more equitable distribution of wealth that allows a society to sustain itself. The only prerequisite is the abolition of capital “markets” (financialized rather than 'real') in favour of real, local genuine markets that manifest a true productive economy where everyone wins instead of a few predatory speculators.

    Just one crucial example: in the realm of shifting from a petro-based economy to one that is energy-sustainable, that can't happen under our last-stage capitalism, but can be done under a sensibly-rendered socialism. If we do not make that step, since we have so much oil, fresh water, etc., we will be subject to being preyed upon by less prudent nations, and they don't have to attack us to achieve this, the capitalist system will bring about the depredation all on its own and we'll be left wondering 'what happened?'. Socialism is the real answer to Jeff's call for an urgent re-adjustment. He himself became sufficiently uneasy with commenting on the machinations of Capital that he left his job, but he hasn't really grasped what is necessary to effect a true transition. Jeff, discard your attitude inoculation and consider what a mature socialism could do to achieve the aims you aspire to see.