The first thing you notice as you fly into Copenhagen, where I recently made a speech, is the ring of wind turbines surrounding the city. I guess that’s why it was chosen to be the backdrop for the world environmental summit last December.

There is certainly much to be said for Denmark’s leadership in green energy. While North American carbon emissions have risen by around 30 per cent since 1990 (the reference point for the Kyoto Accord), Denmark’s emissions are actually lower than they were two decades ago. That’s generally ascribed to the fact that a world-leading 20 per cent of the power generated in Denmark comes from wind.

Less commonly known is the source of the other 80 per cent. I was surprised to discover that it comes from good old King Coal. In fact, coal’s share of power generation in Denmark’s power grid is basically the same as it is in China.

Since green energy technology accounts for 12 per cent of the country’s exports, I can understand why Denmark wants to showcase its wind turbines instead of its smokestacks. But it’s power from those smokestacks that turn on the lights in Copenhagen, at least for the most part.

How, then, has Denmark been so successful in managing its carbon emissions? The answer lies not with the source of power, but with the price of power. At 30 cents per kilowatt hour, electricity costs anywhere from three to five times what the average North American would pay. And, not surprisingly, Danish households consume a fraction of the power that we do.

But I bet if you charged 30 cents per kilowatt hour for power in coal-burning states like Wyoming and West Virginia, they, too, could cap their emissions, and without having to install a single wind turbine.

The other reason commonly cited for Denmark’s success at carbon management is cars—or, more precisely, the lack thereof. Nearly everyone in Copenhagen seems to be riding a bicycle. At first I thought this was testament to the environmental consciousness of the populace, or at a minimum, to a commitment to physical fitness. Then I checked out what it costs to buy a car.

Depending on how many horses are under the hood, Danish car buyers pay a tax ranging anywhere from 100 to 180 per cent of the sticker price of the vehicle. In other words, when you purchase a car in Copenhagen, you can pay almost as much as if you were buying three cars in North America. At that tax rate, I’d be riding a bike too.

What I learned from my trip to Copenhagen is that you don’t have to be a world leader in green energy technology to cap your carbon emissions. Just charge 30 cents per kilowatt hour for power, and slap a 180 per cent surcharge on vehicle prices. Consumers will do all the rest.

Share
  • jdford

    Here in Ontario McGuinty has raised the average price to between 15 and 17¢ per kWh under time-of-use pricing (including all other charges and taxes) which reduces our difference to 'only' about have the Danish price.

    If a climate of political will does not exist among voters who back these initiatives – including things like carbon taxes – governments who enact such shifts will find themselves out of power at the next election.

    Clearly the Danes enjoy a healthy view of what's right for their own future and are supporting the politicians who create the policies, or their energy prices and policy wouldn't have been successful thus far.

  • Rojelio

    Therein lies our problem in the USA. Try putting a tax on fossil fuels and we'll use our last tank of gasoline to drag the politicians through the streets behind our SUVs. And we're so darn fat, we can barely waddle out of our air conditioned pickup trucks to the donut shop. How are we going to ride bicycles all the way out to the strip malls with our giant ass cheeks hanging 2 feet down on either side of the seat? You do realize that so many overly packaged bags of plastic trash from the big box stores would be difficult to transport back to our large houses in the suburbs by bicycle? I think when it comes right down to it, we'll try and blast the middle east into oblivion to make a grab on their last supplies of the good stuff.

  • James_chisholm

    Jeff,

    Good luck on the book.

    I am a financial writer who has been published in Futures Magazine, and the Oil and Gas Journal. I have financial data, and a statistical workup, that show that oil and gas supply relates to population in the U.S and long term interest rates. If you want a copy of the excel spreadsheet, please contact me at the email associated with this blog.

    Jim

  • unbelievable2

    With McGuinty's Green Energy Act paying subsidies of 15 to 80 cents per KWHR for the next 20 years it won't be long before Ontario will be jusy like Denmark!

  • Kanodia Bharat

    Hey Jeff,

    A nice article indeed, however being a layman I could not exactly understand if you are supporting what Danes are doing or othervise.

    Me being from Indian sub continent understand and feel that the rapid growth in our country in the last two decades have increased the fuel consumption many fold but with government being equally active in implmenting pollution control measures, the pollution levels have rater decreased in major cities.

    However in my personal opinion we tend to use or rather misuse the things we they come for cheap or are subsidised by the government. This has been the case with the Petroleum products in our country. Every thing from petrol, diesel to kerosene and LPG gas is heavily subsidised and this leads to wastage of these perscious resources.

    Now government has decided that the petrol and diesel prices would be decided by the free market and I feel that this would be a very good step in curbing the wastage of these resources.

    They cant do much about the kerosene prices as it is used by a major chunk of our not so well off citizens, and I agree on that too.

    Now Jeff, you being an expert on this, I am dying to have an article from you on Indian sub continent.

    Kindest Regards,

    Bharat Kanodia

    kanodia.bharat@gmail.com

  • Kanodia Bharat

    Hey Jeff,

    A nice article indeed, however being a layman I could not exactly understand if you are supporting what Danes are doing or othervise.

    Me being from Indian sub continent understand and feel that the rapid growth in our country in the last two decades have increased the fuel consumption many fold but with government being equally active in implmenting pollution control measures, the pollution levels have rater decreased in major cities.

    However in my personal opinion we tend to use or rather misuse the things we they come for cheap or are subsidised by the government. This has been the case with the Petroleum products in our country. Every thing from petrol, diesel to kerosene and LPG gas is heavily subsidised and this leads to wastage of these perscious resources.

    Now government has decided that the petrol and diesel prices would be decided by the free market and I feel that this would be a very good step in curbing the wastage of these resources.

    They cant do much about the kerosene prices as it is used by a major chunk of our not so well off citizens, and I agree on that too.

    Now Jeff, you being an expert on this, I am dying to have an article from you on Indian sub continent.

    Kindest Regards,

    Bharat Kanodia

    kanodia.bharat@gmail.com

  • liquidsnake2010

    To create wind turbines, hybrid cars etc, you need rare earths. China intends to keep them all.

    http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2010/08/31/pm-rare-earth-minerals-from-china-are-rarer/#

    If you want to reduce co2, as an indirect way of consuming less fossil fuels, then you would grow more plants to absorb the co2, and ideally grow hemp so you could then use it as a fuel, creating a closed loop system. Its not really a choice of maintaining monopoly anymore, its a case of society overiding the primitive chimps who use violence to enforce their authority and switching to a genuinely sustainable fuel.

    In addition to pricing mechanisms, Use the internet for remote working to save fuel, use horses, fed with hemp seed, for local transportation, and natural gas airships for long distance travel across the US. Airships are relatively cheap to build and could possibly be fuelled with methane from animal waste. It could easily be done, even in these precarious times. Check out Marko Rodin, absolute genius, recognised by the brightest minds in the western world, and has the designs for magnetic engines etc but completely ignored by the powers that be because it would break the fossil fuel dynasty. Rodin has been around for 35 years with this stuff, and no-one has commercially produced a product based on his mathematics. What chance the widespread implementation of primitive technology such as wind turbines?

    I hope for the best and prepare for the worst, but i forsee america probably just splitting into thousands of tiny communities, that are self sufficient, like the native americans. There sa lot of mad max types who think you can sit in a bunker with a small arsenal and just emerge six months later and everythings back to normal, that type of behaviour wont be successful, only tactics used by the natives will work.

  • liquidsnake2010

    Sir

    I understand that india is developing technology such as wood stoves as sustainable methods for heating and cooking. Thats sensible strategy, and it would be great to see India become a major Hemp producer to show how much potential Hemp has as an industrial resource.

  • Coalman

    By burning dirty coal China is doing the world a great service as the sulphur aerosols are a net contributor to global cooling. Too much clean coal burning and natural gas combustion in the west is really the problem, assuming CO2 is causing global warming(or is it climate change,now). Let us hope they don't clean up their act anytime soon.

  • William Bendsen

    @Coalman, the sulphuric acid that is a result of dirty coal is not proven to be a global coolant, but it is proven to be damned acidic. Stop spouting nonsense.

    @Liquidsnake. Methane is heavier than air. Good luck with that balloon. Also, Marko Rodin is a fraud.

  • Radioexec

    The only source of power that will meet the needs is Nuclear. More importantly Thorium in a Liquid Flouride Thorium Reactor. With no CO2 emissions. Wind is a joke. Europe is already failing with renewables. How much was spent on the dane turbines? How much did the turbines account for energy last year compared to the coal they use? How much power is generated from them. Not what written on the plate but what they supplied. I heard last year Germany only recieved 8% of its energy from renewables. Brown coal powered the rest. France is almost 80% nuclear. They have the right idea. Start doing some reading on 3rd and 4th gen nuclear. More importantly, start reading on the failure of renewables and how much big oil supports them. Like Chevrons involvement in the Blythe desert solar. Gee whiz…If I had to invest 6 billion to secure my 200 billion.. I think I might do that. The only reason big oil is into renewables is it ensures we stay dependent on them. As already shown.